Antique 1898-1902 Ivory And Apricot Porcelain Sugar Bowl And Creamer By Locke & Co cheapest Worcester England, Gold Gilt Edges, Shell Or Leaf Design

$67.67
#SN.912010
Antique 1898-1902 Ivory And Apricot Porcelain Sugar Bowl And Creamer By Locke & Co cheapest Worcester England, Gold Gilt Edges, Shell Or Leaf Design, This beautiful antique set is in excellent conditionThe porcelain sugar bowl is ivory with a yellow tint and.
Black/White
  • Eclipse/Grove
  • Chalk/Grove
  • Black/White
  • Magnet Fossil
12
  • 8
  • 8.5
  • 9
  • 9.5
  • 10
  • 10.5
  • 11
  • 11.5
  • 12
  • 12.5
  • 13
Add to cart
Product code: Antique 1898-1902 Ivory And Apricot Porcelain Sugar Bowl And Creamer By Locke & Co cheapest Worcester England, Gold Gilt Edges, Shell Or Leaf Design

This beautiful antique set is in excellent condition!
The porcelain sugar bowl is ivory, with a yellow tint, and a splash of apricot on the sides.
It has shell or leaf shapes around the sides and a scalloped edge with gold gilt trim.
The creamer is also ivory colored porcelain, and it has the apricot color on the spout and on the handle.
It has a scalloped edge as well, and the gold gilt trim.
Both pieces are in excellent condition, no cracks or crazing.
The bowl does have 1 tiny chip on the edge, please see the photos.
Both pieces do have a few tiny black dots that look to have been done during production, and both show some light wear on the bottoms.
The insides are clean and shiny.
Both cheapest are marked... Locke & Co. Ltd, Worcester, England, in the round globe.
This mark was used from 1898 to 1902.
The bowl is hand marked 343 and the creamer 282, which is the shape number of each piece.
Bowl measures...
4" in diameter
1 7/8" high
Creamer...
4 1/4" length
3" width
1 3/4" high

Edward Locke's porcelain wares closely resembled the works of Royal Worcester porcelain.
Locke was a modeler at the Royal Worcester factory before opening his own shop.
James Hadley the lead modeler at Royal Worcester left their employ around the time that Locke opened his shop, and Hadley rented a studio from Locke.
Both men were sued by the Royal Worcester Company because they used the name 'Worcester' in their trademark logos, which implied the works were of the same ilk.
They were required to remove the 'Worcester' name after 1902.

.
406 review

4.95 stars based on 406 reviews